This might be me mis-reading the text, but the below statement from Recommendation -> #2 suggests that is a child of . To my understanding, would not be inside but rather . should be a sibling of , not a child. The statement from the recommendation:
“… can have zero or multiple s (if more than one, must be from the same funder).”
Comment from user:
This might be me mis-reading the text, but the below statement from Recommendation -> #2 suggests that is a child of . To my understanding, would not be inside but rather . should be a sibling of , not a child. The statement from the recommendation:
“… can have zero or multiple s (if more than one, must be from the same funder).”
Thanks!